As a team, the Astros are not a great power hitting team. Out of the thirty major league clubs, Houston ranks sixth to last with a meager total of 51. Two players have had a major role in contributing this meager total:
Outside of Blum, our corner positions (1B, LF and RF), all hold their own in regard to home run hitting. With 3B being a gaping hole for this club, the other positions would have to step up their power production to compensate. This, unfortunately, has not occurred heretofore. Michael Bourn is not a power hitter, and will never be a power hitter. His approach has been light years better this season, and one cannot fault him for forsaking the flyball for a greater number of line drives and grounders. Second base is a position that is capable of hitting double digit home runs for a starting player in today's major leagues. A triple headed monster of Matsui/Maysonet/Keppinger has combined to hit four home runs in 312 ABs. For those keeping score, that's one home run in every 78 ABs. Miguel Tejada has had a respectable power season, having seen his ISO and SLG% all rise from 2008. He is a staggering 11 runs above average when facing the fastball in 2009- a source of his increased production. Pudge Rodriguez hasn't been a power hitter for quite some time, and that trend has continued this season. His HR/FB% is the highest in recent seasons though (15.8%), helping to boost his totals.
Hitting home runs doesn't guarantee a team anything, but there is a strong correlation between team success and having a high SLG%. It doesn't look like the Astros are going to be able to take advantage of the long ball, so they will have to find other ways to boost run production.
0 recs | 9 comments
Berkman and Lee...
are part of the problem… in a way.
Berkman’s isolated power is down (.243 vs. career .258) and Lee’s ISO of .214 would be the lowest of his Astros’ career (he was .255 last year).
clack - June 18, 2009
Doesn't Work Without Small Ball
The problem with over-reliance on the long ball is slumps and good pitching from the opposition.
One of the criticisms of Blum from last year was that he swung hard at everything and had, at least at one point, an uncomfortable number of whiffs with runners on base.
Even with the few HRs that the Astros have had, they seen to have a chronic problem with empty bases when the HRs do occur. And, when the bases do get filled, the HRs rarely seem to materialize.
I have never really been a fan of the long ball as a key offensive pillar. A bonus and nice-to-have, yes, but only if the hitting foundation and small ball fundamentals are already established.
pel - June 18, 2009
Well, it guarantees that at least one run is scored.
Only_A_Lad - June 18, 2009
And as Peyton Manning so eloquently said a few years back, “When the one team scores more…they win.”
Elephande - June 18, 2009
touche
tell that to the rangers of 2008 though
Evan Hochschild - June 18, 2009
well, yeah.
The 2008 Rangers hit a lot of homers, and they scored a lot of runs. They were 3rd in the AL in home runs, and they had its best offense (even when park-adjusted).
The real example of all-power no-score are the White Sox. They hit the most home runs, but they were barely above league-average in offense, once you adjust for park effects. It’s because they don’t get on base very much.
Only_A_Lad - June 18, 2009
look at the whole sentence:
I really just meant that a team that hits a lot of homers/xbh isn’t guaranteed to have a great record- but it sure helps.
Evan Hochschild - June 18, 2009
fuck that
I’m going to jump to conclusions. You’re not my teacher, man.
Only_A_Lad - June 18, 2009
Evan Hochschild - June 18, 2009
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of The Crawfish Boxes to post a comment.