The holiday season has arrived for a large portion of humanity, and that means good food, time with family, and the giving of gifts. Astros fans have suffered through what perhaps was one of the most difficult seasons for any fanbase since man picked up a stick and decided to take a whack at a ball of yarn.
First, the "Good Guys" struggled to a franchise-low 106 losses. Then, it became apparent that the club's owner, Drayton McLane, Jr was doing the equivalent of coasting carelessly through a few senior-year electives as he waited to hand off a franchise that he no longer maintained much interest in. Afterwards, the sale of the club was delayed by Major League Baseball as they claimed to investigate (for the third time) character claims against the new owner-in-waiting, Jim Crane, thus preventing an already budget-handicapped front office from making any useful changes to improve the club. Finally, Astros fans watched helplessly as Crain was strong-armed by MLB into accepting a $70 million bribe to move the Astros to the American League, which was widely criticized by just about everybody, including teams in the American League.
Yes, it's been a rough year. But now it's the holidays and the Astros are receiving gifts unheard of since Jeff Bagwell was given to them in an act of unprecedented charity. First, the Astros hired a GM, Jeff Lunhow who seemed eager to pull the franchise out of outdated methods of player development with statistical analysis applied to methodical scouting practices, and who even sees the importance of communicating with the fans. Next, an unexpected gift. Lunhow traded a player not needed for when the Astros regain relevance for a starting shortstop with a good hitting reputation and a solid and projectable minor league starter. Below, Jed Lowrie, the new shortstop for the Houston Astros, will have his stats unwrapped to give fans a good look at what they can look forward to in 2012.

Lowrie played for the Stanford Cardinal, where he was teammates with other current major leaguers, and where he won the PAC-10 Player of the Year award in 2004. He was drafted by the Red Sox and made his major league debut in 2008 due to injuries to the big league roster. He has seen part-time duties ever since, and has been constantly blocked by high-priced veterans, including Julio Lugo, Marco Scutaro, Mike Lowell, and Kevin Youkilis. In 2009, the Red Sox regarded Lowrie as their starter (contrary to some concerns by fans that the Red Sox never saw him as one), but injuries derailed his career starting in that year.
In 2011, Lowrie was traded to the Astros with minor-league pitcher Kyle Weiland, in return for relief pitcher Mark Melancon. Experts see the trade as a win for both teams, with the potential for greater return on the Astros' side due to Lowrie and Weiland's potential. The Red Sox have another minor league shortstop ready for the majors, and so dealt from a position of strength to address a pressing need in the bullpen.
Lowrie is a 27-year-old shortstop with a reputation for below-average defense and being injury-prone, though as seen below both of these reputations appear un-earned. He is a switch hitter and is regarded as a well-above-average hitter at his position.
Unfairly, Lowrie has been labeled as injury-prone, and despite no history of major injuries in the minor leagues, fans have questioned his durability. In 2009, Lowrie required surgery on his wrist, which landed him on the 60-day DL. Briefly after returning, a flare-up occured but he has had no wrist issues since. Wrist injuries sometimes lessen a player's power, but since returning from this surgery Lowrie has shown no lessening of in-game power.
Unfortunately, in 2010 Lowrie had a serious bout of Mononucucleosis which held him out of over 100 games, thus putting his career on hold even longer. In 2011, a collision in the field led to a pinched nerve in the shoulder that landed him on DL.
None of these injuries are related, and if all are healed (obviously, the Astros believe they are), there is no reason to expect a recurrence. The "injury prone" label that has been applied to Lowrie appears to be baseless without some evidence that he is less durable than other players.
Jed Lowrie has amassed 920 plate appearances in the major league so far, enough to identify trends. The table below summarizes his career performance to date.
Lowrie, a switch-hitter, is a superstar-level hitter against lefties, and a very poor one against right-handers. This may lead to the same frustration that fans experienced with Lance Berkman, another switch-hitter who was superior from one side of the plate than he was from the other. One can hope that the Astros staff will recognize this and convince Lowrie to give up on switch-hitting, at least for a time, to determine if he can improve his stats against northpaws. Else, fans can likely expect vast differences in the quality of his at-bats, as well as opposing managers making bullpen moves to create favorable match-ups for their hurlers.
Other things to note from this table is Lowrie's excellent walk rate, which points to good plate discipline, even against right handers. This suggests that he does not have a poor approach from that side of the plate, but rather he just stinks at making good contact. His lower-than-other-Astros Swing %, high contact rate, and low strikeout rate also point towards good plate discipline. Perhaps he can positively influence young hackers on the team like Jose Altuve and Jimmy Paredes.
The defensive metrics paint a picture different from Lowrie's reputation as a below-average defender. Based on the sample shown so far in his career, he can be classified as almost exactly average in the field. While a downgrade from Clint Barmes (who was too expensive for the Astros' tastes and not as good at the plate anyway), this is still a huge improvement over most of the options on the Free Agent market and over the Astros' in-house option, Angel Sanchez, who is quite bad at the position.
Pitch F/X shows Lowrie's tendencies versus left-handers and right-handers, further indicating that he should swallow some pride and admit that he just isn't a switch-hitter. In the graphics below, the red and blue rectangles are "heat maps" of where Lowrie has had success creating positive outcomes with a swing. Red is good, Blue is not good. For more info about Pitch F/X, please see this link at Fangraphs.
The charts above indicate that pitchers think they can beat Lowrie on the inside lower corner of the strike zone, particularly with breaking balls. Oddly, the results don't seem to bear this out, at least with fastballs, which he crushes in that zone. He does struggle with breaking balls there, but not enough to justify the frequency which he is pitched in that location.
The top graph (against RHP) shows that pitchers recognize how weak Lowrie is against them from the left side of the plate. The pitches cluster around the zone, with relatively few thrown far outside for him to chase. The pitchers are counting on Lowrie to make weak contact, and so are challenging him inside the zone. So far, it seems to be working, a fact that one can hope the Astros hitting coaches will recognize and advise him about. Again, a change may be needed, such as dropping the switch-hit routine.
The next charts show the pitches that Lowrie has swung and missed on.
As speculated, Lowrie tends to swing at breaking balls inside and below the zone. Perhaps he has difficultly distinguishing those pitches, or is eager to swing, as such pitches would appear to be directly in the middle of the zone as they leave the pitcher's hands. Still, this is risky for the pitcher, as Lowrie absolutely mashes breaking balls that hang in the middle of the zone. Also, his hand-eye coordination appears to be not as sharp against right-handers, as he swings and misses at a higher percentage of pitches inside the zone against them. Lowrie already has a good approach, and if he is able to adjust and pick up ball spin a little better, he could become fearsome, especially against lefties.
In Lowrie, the Astros have acquired a cost-effective (well below the market value of a free-agent shortstop) player who is among the best with a bat at his position, while not providing negative value with his glove. Astros fans should be thrilled with this. Lowrie is still young and talented enough to make adjustments to further increase his value to the franchise, and for the first time in his career has an all-but guaranteed starting job.
Lowrie will quickly become expensive, as he is now in his arbitration years, but his cost in upcoming seasons still projects to be lower than a shortstop of equivalent value on the market, and therefore he will remain a valuable commodity until he hits free agency in a few years.
The Astros have another shortstop in the minors who is seen as a big part of their future, Jonathan Villar. Lowrie's presence eliminates the need to rush Villar through the minors, giving him the chance to let his bat catch up with his glove. When Villar is deemed ready, Lowrie will give the Astros a great opportunity to trade for even more top prospects, as few, if any, commodities in baseball are more valuable than a young shortstop who can hit.
The holidays have come early for Astros fans, and they should be excited about the early indications of the direction of the franchise.
0 recs | 38 comments
Lowrie thinks he still got it from the left side
http://m.mlb.com/hou/news/article/2011121426163266/
Lowrie said that injuries has caused his left handed swing to suffer over the past few seasons, and with consistent at-bats he would be a good hitter from the left side.
He also said in that article that in college he was better from the left side and scouts were questioning his ability to hit from the right side of the plate.
I am hopeful that Lowrie is correct and he regains form from the left side.
conroestro - December 23, 2011 via mobile
fah!
Berkman always had dozens of excuses for why he should be a better switch hitter than he is. Until I see any evidence that convinces me otherwise, lowrie’s reasons are only going to sound to me like a guy who thinks he’s a good switch hitter and doesn’t want to face facts. I hope he proves me wrong but im not expecting it since he was just as bad in 2011the against rhp as he was back when his wrist hurt
CRPerry13 - January 1, 2012 via mobile
Good article
I guess it depends on your definition of “injury-prone”, but I think it’s fair to use the label on a player who has missed significant time due to injury for 3 straight years. Now, the fact that the injuries aren’t related may change the label from “injury-prone” to “unlucky”, but I don’t think it would shock anyone if Lowrie missed a significant # of games next season.
That said, you’re right to note that since the injuries were not related, it’s easier to be positive about his future health. And if Lowrie stays healthy, I think it’s pretty much a guarantee that the Astros won this trade, regardless of what happens with Weiland. Here’s to hoping he not only stays healthy but exceeds performance expectations and becomes an extremely valuable player.
Snake Diggity - December 23, 2011
The discussion of “injury prone” we have had, in light of Castro and Lawrie, has made me think about that term. And it’s not easy to pin down when the term is justified. I can think of two justified uses of the term. If a player is prone to take excessive risks (like Aaron Rowand running into outfield walls), I can see justification for the term. If a player is physically or genetically predisposed to injury (like a player with inherently weaker than normal knee structures), that seems to justify the term. But beyond that, it’s harder to sort out when injury is just bad luck versus a proneness to be injured.
This would be a good subject for an article by Subber10, who knows more about the subject than me.
clack - December 23, 2011
I doubt that changing him to pure RHB is a good idea.
First, it would require a lot of intensive work to convert to batting RH against RHP, and I doubt that the Astros would want to put that kind of added pressure on him when he is getting his first real chance to be starter. If we are choosing where Lowrie should put his extra practice time, I would pick defensive work over converting from switch hitter. It’s possible that the pressure of trying to hit RHP from the right side could detract from his hitting from the good side.
Second, unless he has some non-switch hitting experience in his background, it’s unlikely to be successful. The odds are that the would hit even worse against RHP if he had to hit as a RHB. That’s why so few switch hitters at the major league level have converted back to one side hitting—it’s just too late. Some ML switch hitters say that can’t even hit battting practice pitchers from the same side. Switch hitters aren’t used to seeing the breaking pitch coming toward them, and they have to overcome the tendency to bail out—-and if they have been switch hitting all of their life, that’s too hard to do against major league quality pitchers.
At this point, I don’t think that the result of 600 plate appearances versus RHPs is sufficient to take the drastic move of forcing him to convert from switch hitter to pure RHB. If something in his background makes him comfortable in undertaking a conversion, that’s a different story. But I haven’t seen anything along those lines—-particularly given his belief that injuries have caused his problems versus RHPs in the recent past.
clack - December 23, 2011
I'm not sure I agree with you here
From what I’ve read, the reason most switch hitters refuse to try hitting from one side of the plate is sheer stubbornness. I’ve heard Astros coaches say they tried to talk Berkman into it, and he’s refused by the simple reasoning that he’s “always been a switch hitter.” The fact that he’s never been a GOOD switch hitter doesn’t seem to matter to him.
Frankly, Lowrie is so good against left-handers that it’s really hard to imagine that he would be worse against right handers batting from the right side of the plate than he is now. I’m just not buying the argument without some convincing evidence of players who have made that change and seen their stats suffer noticibly. As lousy as Lowrie is against righties (and he is lousy), there’s no real convincing argument that can be made for NOT trying to make a change.
CRPerry13 - December 24, 2011
I can’t find Lowrie’s minor league splits, so I’m not willing to conclude that he can’t be an acceptable hitter from the right side. 600 PA’s is almost a season’s worth, but it’s not enough to narrow the confidence band to the point that we can dismiss his ability to hit from the right side. I think the odds are a lot better that a larger sample will improve his splits over time than a change to non-switch hitting will improve his splits. (I wouldn’t be surprised if the very small number of PAs for LHB side hitting overstates his hitting ability from that side, and that the sample for RHB understates his hitting ability from that side….meaning that the gap between LHB and RHB hitting isn’t as large as it seems from the sample so far.)
Brett Wallace has struggled versus LHBs so far…..so should he be converted to a switch hitter? That makes almost as much sense. There are probably more examples of major leaguers successfully converting to switch hitter than there are major leaguers successfully converting from switch hitter to one side hitter. J.T. Snow is the only established player who changed from switch hitter to LHB that I can find. And he only did it because he got so few at bats against LHPs that he he had trouble keeping his LH side batting sharp.
clack - December 24, 2011
Berkman "never been a good switch hitter"?
Berkman was once a fantastic switch hitter. Only in the last few years has he really struggled right handed.
I don’t think being a switch hitter gains you much as people think statistically over a normal hitter. I like what it does to the dynamic of the line up.
man07 - December 24, 2011 via mobile
berkman has never been a good switch hitter
Career ops vs rhp: over 1.000. Vs lhp: .770. Those aren’t the splits of a successful switch hitter. Its the difference between albert pujols and chris johnson. How good could lance have been had he just swung leftie? We’lll never know but ill always think he was stupid for not giving it a serious try. Might have cost him a HOF entry.
CRPerry13 - January 1, 2012 via mobile
and if he doesn’t succeed as a left handed hitter he doesn’t become Lance Berkman.
Timothy De Block - January 1, 2012
oddity....
On Aug. 16 of this year, Lowrie started a triple play for the Red Sox against Tampa Bay.
clack - December 23, 2011
Good read
orangeblood kid - December 23, 2011
Good Read
orangeblood kid - December 23, 2011
didn't mean to post that twice.
orangeblood kid - December 23, 2011
thanks
CRPerry13 - December 24, 2011
I am more excited to see what Lowrie can do
than I am any other player the Astros have. I may be overly optimistic but i believe he could snag an allstar appearance or two.
Uncle Chris - December 23, 2011
He has that potential. Interested to see how he will respond to finally having a starting job locked up.
conroestro - December 23, 2011 via mobile
Im going to laugh/wouldn't be surprised
When we look back as Weiland being the steal in this trade. Speaking of pitchers though, anybody see a similarity in Paul Clemens and Bud Norris?
Its Gonna Happen - December 23, 2011 via mobile
I have Bud Norris used as a comparison for Paul Clemens quite a bit since he was acquired. I don’t know a whole lot about Clemens, but I’m assuming that this is based primarily on velocity. I want to say that I read where Clemens has a more broader repertoire at this point in the minors than what Norris did, but I would have to go back and double check that. Looking at stats Clemens doesn’t have the strikeout numbers that Norris put up in the minors.
conroestro - December 24, 2011 via mobile
Above typo
I have seen Bud Norris used….
conroestro - December 24, 2011 via mobile
I could see that happening too
I think he’s going to be a lot better pitcher than most people think. I could see him becoming a solid #2 or #3. I love this trade by the way.
Uncle Chris - December 24, 2011
Weiland that is
Uncle Chris - December 24, 2011
I doubt Clemens ever has a secondary pitch as good as Bud's slider
OremLK - December 24, 2011
I thought I read that he had a good curve
But I agree, Buds slider is wicked
Its Gonna Happen - December 24, 2011 via mobile
Off Topic
The A’s designated Powell and Miller for assignment, any chance we pick one up? Powell, 29, seems to be a defensive catcher (big surprise), and we’re rumored to be looking around. But, with Tatum on our roster we really don’t need 2 of the same guy. Especially for a backup.
Miller intruiged me though. As a soon to be 27 year old outfielder, he just clubbed 32 HRs in AAA and 1 in a Sept call up. He looks to be a .270-ish hitter with some speed (16 SB last year). He CAN take a walk (54) but WOULD RATHER strikeout (179). Still he had an OPS of .956 and seems interesting. Twas just a question I had fluttering around at 430 in the A.M. Not really thinking where/what we would do with him.
Do we still get first dibs on waivers and such?
Its Gonna Happen - December 24, 2011 via mobile
We don't get first dibs on waivers for AL guys, as far as I know
Only if all AL teams pass on him. Of course, that changes next year.
OremLK - December 24, 2011
Jai Miller is interesting since he can play CF. His K rate is an incredible 37.7%. in AAA. I assume that is why he has never stuck in the majors. But he did have a .312 isolated power and 32 HR, and even if Sacramento is a hitter friendly park , those are great power numbers. This guy kind of reminds me of Charlton Jimerson, if you remember the ex-Astros’ center field prospect of 4 or 5 years ago.
clack - December 24, 2011
Was Jimerson the one who hit a home run in his first big league at bat with us?
Stupendous Man - December 24, 2011 via mobile
Yes, that is correct.
BustaPozee - December 24, 2011
Here is Jimerson’s player page at fangraphs, by the way. In fairness to Jai Miller, he walks quite a bit more than Jimerson did. Jimerson combined a very high K rate with the inability to take a walk.
clack - December 24, 2011
That was awesome.
Almost straight away center field, I don’t remember who he hit it off, but I remember going crazy since I used to watch him when he was playing for CC in ’05. It was against the Phillies.
ccislanders - December 24, 2011 via mobile
I dont remember this guy at all
Feel like I’m in the twilight zone…
Its Gonna Happen - December 24, 2011 via mobile
In other news about our future AL West competition....
Reportedly MLB has promised the A’s that a move to a ballpark in San Jose will be approved by Februrary. This will make the A’s more competitive, financially, in a couple of years, after the new ballpark is approved. I think this anticipated event, combined with the Darvish and Pujols acquisitions by the Rangers and Angels, may be behind the A’s recent trades for prospects. Beane wants a group of near-ML ready prospects who will be ready for the team when it opens the new stadium. Beane has said that the A’s and Rangers off-season moves have eliminated the A’s ability to compete in the near term.
clack - December 24, 2011
Link for above.
clack - December 24, 2011
should read “built” instead of “approved.”
clack - December 24, 2011
So...
The Astros are screwed in the near future by the Angels and Rangers, and in the long term by the A’s (and Mariners can only suck so long before they go all Tampa Bay on the world right?)
Top 5 picks for the next 3+ years, here we come!
Its Gonna Happen - December 24, 2011 via mobile
Eventually the Astros will be the ones going Tampa Bay on everybody
Uncle Chris - December 24, 2011
Fingers crossed
Its Gonna Happen - December 24, 2011 via mobile
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of The Crawfish Boxes to post a comment.